Tuesday, February 5, 2013

To Ugliness.


Those red Chrysanthemums on the way home
Now withered into the stillness of a sad sober night,
The silence deafening, the calm ghostly, the rain joyless
All shameless spectators of your disappearance
Into the lusty labyrinth of liberation after life.


Symmetrical splendor in balanced beings is like a whore without antics—drab like a sterilised supermarket where there’s no haggling. But unwavering cravers of equilibrium that we are, we let ourselves submit to the hegemonic idea of rightness and beauty without ever attempting to dissect the ugly and understand it, embrace it as a natural doppelganger of all of us. Some braver mortals do; mostly sub-consciously though. This is a tribute to one of them—a drunk-fuck, a moneyless miserable mess of a man.  And in respects more than just a few—a disagreeable double of myself. Of course, they said he was ugly.

I don’t know when we first met. I’m not supposed to. In all probability, it was the first day of my life. If he was sober enough to come to the hospital that is. I clearly remember when we last did though. An uncannily bright day in the midst of a monsoon that was particularly savage. It had rained so much that year they say the rhinos even meandered into the dhaba at Jokholabandha. The meeting, by any standards, was unsentimental, like they always are in my patriarchal side of the family. My mother’s family is more of the expressive kind—hugs, kisses, and extended pleasantries. I like to believe I’m more inclined towards the former. Ma says that too, though she is not one bit glad about it. So on the day too that he had come Ma served tea and biscuits. She wouldn’t cook anything for him; he wasn’t important enough. Ma’s a nice woman, but she has her set of prejudices. As her only son on whom she’s preached her ideologies for more than 22 years now, I’m supposed to understand them, but I don’t most of the time, which has resulted in a fair amount of friction, but then, we get along well enough, and things are sufficiently cordial for us to do all the ‘happy family’ things.

All families, they say, have a black sheep. He was the one in ours I suppose. I often hear wild phases get over with college. He didn’t attend college; in fact hardly finished school—an anomaly of rather catastrophic proportions, when contrasted to my father—his younger brother—who holds a PhD in something that I believe is almost nonsensically scholarly. His wasn’t much of a wild phase, more of a way of a life gone terribly wrong. A motley mix of severe social incongruity, constantly at loggerheads with the family, his was an existence that seemed to serve very little purpose. Maybe that’s why he finally just left—like people do when staying is no longer an option.  Into the oblivion of an unknown city he was in for the first time in his life, amidst people who didn’t understand the only language he spoke.

It’s been quite a while now since that evening. The impossible attempt to locate a missing person in our country undertaken, the customary tears shed, the odd reminiscence in family dinners about a particular mutton curry he would have surely liked,  normalcy for all the people to whom he mattered and—hopefully mattered to him too—has resumed. It’d be a case of glorifying relationships post their lifetime if I were to make the claim of being exceptionally close to him. The truth is I wasn’t. But as I struggle with my own quarter-life existential dilemmas, I am drawn back to those years when on my birthdays when he’d religiously get me a bar of chocolate or a fancy pen. Invariably, it would be my cheapest birthday present among encyclopedias and pullovers (I was born in December), but in my convent bred conscience, would be somewhat sentimental. Come to think of it, it wasn’t reverence that made me look at it in a different light, it wasn’t even love. It was, in fact, pity that I felt towards him. I knew he would never be able to afford the gifts I’d get from the other people, would perhaps never even have a son to celebrate birthdays of.  Now, it seems I knew a lot for someone who had just learnt how to jerk off stealing surreptitious glimpses of anorexic models on Fashion TV. But then, it is hardly difficult to identify asymmetry in a world obsessed with regularity, and inconformity to standards means disaster. As the case is with him, I was told in no uncertain terms.  

A bar of Kitkat is not exactly the best sixteenth birthday gift, but having  graduated from getting off on skinny Naomi Watts to actually feeling the warmness of the breasts of a more believable flawed girl, Kitkat had started to assume more significance than just an embodiment of  pity. And now as I grapple with my own existential dilemmas, I wonder if the solidarity I would put up or at least, pretend to was in anyway a premonition of things to come in my life, or perhaps a premature acknowledgement of a mirror image, completely at odds with my IIT- America wet dreams. Maybe it wasn’t any of that at all, it was just a casual cognizance of beauty in the ugly, for ugly is the imperfect, the failure, the pimpled, the freckled, the fat, and most obtrusively in the deviant, and I’m, and so are you, all of these and much more derisory, in quantities copious.

So, this is to the man who was ugly to the world, but who bought me Pierre Cardin pens and Kitkat bars beyond his means. And whatever Ma says, I think he was dark and handsome. And beside his smoke-infested left lung nestled a heart of gold. Yes, slightly flawed and ugly—just like the rest of us.

Monday, August 27, 2012

When I tried to sleep


Turning and tossing and trying to sleep
In a bid to fight the night and the  mind
I dream I’m Colonel Aureliano Buendia
Weaving tiny gold fishes
But the only thing that glitters tonight
Is the sweat on my roommate’s bare black body
As he dreams about joyrides on his bullet
In the big broad Banjara Hills road.
The bright blue strip of pink  paracetamols
Tempts me but I dream of Dostoevsky
And decide to write one more poem.

The Night without a Dawn


Flowers in the fort of faith withered
Reeking of a renegade’s resistance.
And slimy sweat of a traitor of trust.
It rained blood that night
Soaking everyone in a sadness of shame
And as the sky turned crimson the next morning
All that everyone did was collect blood crumbs
Thinking of the days gone by
And trying with all their might
Not to think of the days to come.



Far from the madding crowd

Far from the madding crowd
Is such a notorious notion
I think that man with that coolass name
Thomas Hardy, as if he’s some boxer
Who’d bite off Tyson’s left ear
Like it was a slice of half-cooked Roti
That they serve in our messy mess
Every morning, every night
Except for Saturday afternoons
When they make Khichri
Was drunk on rotten rum
When he wrote the fucking phrase.

Lines of Loss


When all that you care for is the next step
But all you can feel is the fan above
Revolving in contempt of all that you can’t
As if scouting for the angle that makes you seem
Worse than a penniless father in a brothel
The tragedy seems more profound than ever
Like being stranded in the middle
Of the Brahmaputra
And the hand you’re seeking
Is in somebody else’s;
Crimson in the watery final sunset.

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Tales from Wasseypur: A land where Coppola’s Sicily meets Sippy’s Sholay






Electronica .
Superimpose into relentless Kalashnikovs.
Tap your feet to unyielding triggers
In the haze of chillum smoke.
Trip on killing.
Dream of ruling.

Bachchhan Amitabh. That’s what coal-mafioso turned politician Ramadheer Singh calls Indian cinema's angry young man turned officially the most versatile range of products’ endorser, in a scene a few frames into the second half of Gangs of Wasseypur-2; and unabashedly slams him and Salman Khan for making the youth believe in the hero with only muscles and no brains. Cinema or rather the cognizant lack of it, he claims,  has what made him what he is—the only man in a town so full of daredevil boys who die older than Hendrix and Morrison, but  much younger than Dev Anand, the evergreen hero all the women would dig when he was in school. Maybe Kashap’s a big Bacchan fan and secretly admires Salman too—the latter earned his less illustrious brother Abhinav, with Dabbang, at one go what Anurag hasn’t earned from all his movies, in spite of all the Cannes romping that he gets to do with arm-candy cum wife Kalki for his ‘world cinema'—for Kashyap takes copious liberties to affect what my high school English teacher would call poetic justice at the end of it all. Yes, at the end of it when Anuraag Kasyap and Zeeshan Quadri finally decide to end their colourfully dark trip of  self-indulgence.


Tum paas aayen, Tum paas aayen
Yun Muskurayen, Tum ne na jane kya kiya
Sapne  dekhaye, Aabto mera dil
Jaane ka sota hai, Kya karoon haye
Kuch kuch hota hai.


And just in the next shot, the delicious Huma Quereshi croons to her Bacchan worshiping husband—in her even-more delicious Bihari accent—languishing  in jail, exercising his hands to her amorous  memory. To raise his spirits and libido, of course. And who comes through eventually—the Bollywood batter or the Bollywood believer—is again carefully camouflaged by a twist that seeks to maintain the best part of this extended LSD trip viewed through the consciousness of heartland India—neutrality. The impish hide and seek Kashyap indulges and to his credit, engages in is the story within the story. And is perhaps one of those rare occasions, when the sub-text is more gripping than the actual text itself.


Summer of 2012.
Syzygy.
De Sica, Amitabh, Anurag.
Who’s behind whom?
There’s still time for it.
Apocalypse that is.

Zeeshan Quadari is a good story-teller but he’s a young man who has a lot to learn still. And the story, though gripping, is at all times set for its predictable end by the virtue of it being a story that thrives on revenge as the backbone  and not as some people would unfairly and high-handedly claim, its Bollywood affiliation.  And after all it is the battle within the battle  we’re interested in—amidst Wasseypur’s maddening gun-powder heavy power tussle and Hema Quereshi’s ( I just can’t get over her) knee-weakening  moves, it’s Anurag Kashap’s personal battle that’s the most engrossing. From Saharanpur’s small town sensibilities to Sica’s sleek storytelling shades, here’s a man who’s seen and felt a lot. He’s tripped on stuff, which if my mother ever came to know of, she’d forbid me from watching his cinema anymore. On one hand, he’s trying to make ground breaking, epoch making and all that can be made and broken cinema, and yet on the other, he is very Bollywood at heart. Grown up on Bachchan, fed on Dev Anand’s eccentricities. The result—charming chaos. Breaks and makes a lot of things. Stereotypes and your heart, at times too.

Tiger on the bed
Tiger in the streets.
A blue lungi.
With and without.

Faizal Khan is Nawazuddin Siddiqui. Nawazuddin  Siddiqui is Faizal Khan. Because, no could else could possibly be either-- good with the gun in his hand and in his groin. He’s in equal measure dedicated to his chillum as he is to his wife. He’s the Bollywood hero. He’s the Bollywood villain.  He’s believable.  And more importantly, brutally brilliant. Most of the one-fifty minutes of Gangs Of Wasseypur-2, Faizal Khan is as sure about himself as an IITian would be of his calculus, but in a beautifully crafted  moment of vulnerability, when Huma (yes, again her) playfully mocks him about his ageing looks.  He tries hard to be that trigger happy hood that he is, but being rebuffed, even though just good-humoredly, by the love of his life brings out in him a rare moment of weakness that subtly stamps Kashyap’s class and Siddiqui’s dexterity. All over again.

Bombs of Benares
Detonating in Wasseypur
Bombs of passion and power
Bonbs of jokes and japes
Bombs that spill blood
Bombs that sieve blood
Bombs of truth
Bombs of time.
Bombs that are not bombs at all.

As Marquez once said of his  morbidly magnificent Hundred Years of Solitude, there’s hardly anything very serious about the seemingly epic in themselves characters of his story; he was merely making jibes at eccentricities of people and places around him. Kashyap may or may not have read Marquez, but he’s enjoying one hearty laugh just as Marquez must have had when conjuring Macondo’s romantic geographical obscurity, when in the deftly drafted murder of a certain important character, the murderer, before drilling a magazine into him asks him (the character) an address in Varanasi.  Varanasi, for the record, is Wasseypur in Gangs of Wasseypur-2.

To begin I need an inspiration
And some madness.
To end is but an art.
I need sanity.
And strength
To feel the new life.

To achieve a climax that is climatic enough in a story that is pulsating with climaxes of sub plots all the time sometimes means to shunt out the crest and troughs of the plot altogether, and sadly and unknowingly let drabness drip into a narrative so full of life just at its end and sadly shut out on all the goodness of a story that was told so well for all its life. Gangs of Wasseypur, though, is fortunately a story that ends well. The juxtaposition of the bigger plot and the smaller plots is smooth. Sultan Quereshi is killed in the wake of an almost funny albeit planned move. Revenge is played out pompously. Not just Sardar Khan and Faizal Khan’s on Ramadheer Singh, but of Anurag Kashyap’s and Zeeshan Quadri’s  on their cinematographic heroes and influences and at the same time contraints. Deewar and The Bicyle Thief both win.  Zeeshan lets the world know, he’s in the man in control.  As Definite, on screen and as a self-assured writer who ends his magnum opus with a smug smirk, off it. Heartening, for finally a writer gets to be the last man standing. Quite literally.

For those gorgeous goggles,
That hide what could kill.
For that sheepish smile
That would move a hill.
For those colourful kaftans
That would light up the dullest mill
For that voice which sings
Frustriao nahi, nervesou nahi.

For Huma Quereshi, of course--the bold and the beautiful . And yes, the balance has been restored once again. She’s a Quereshi you see.